Side Views

25% regional aviation profit growth in 2016? – Koon Yew Yin

I just read Maybank's Kim Eng's recommendation with the above title to buy regional airline shares at bargain valuations. I am not convinced by all the accounting jargons. As I am not a qualified accountant, I always take a rational approach based on economic fundamentals.

One line of simplistic thinking is that there is a bright and profitable future for airlines as the number of air travellers continues to increase by about 5%-7% per year.

But if you look at the history of airline industry profitability, this is not the case for airlines worldwide. The fact is the airline industry requires huge capital and produces poor returns on capital employed. Hence, year after year, many airlines produce poor profit margins or outright losses.

Why, you might ask, is it that an industry with year-on-year rises in sales cannot generate good returns to shareholders?

It all comes down to the economic structure of the industry. One of the forces that limits profitability is the intensity of rivalry between the leading airlines. There is over-supply leading to pressure on prices. This is exacerbated by a high degree of freedom for new competitors to enter the industries. 

If, say, an airline route between two destinations is found to be reasonably profitable, it is not long before new entrants move in or current airlines move their planes to this profitable route.

It is truly an industry governed by the principle of "survival of the fittest".

The ego and elections factor

It would seem that every developing nation wanting to show off its progress to the world must have its own airline, regardless of the impact on an industry already grossly over-supplied, and regardless of whether they have the ability to manage efficiently.

So there is a regular stream of announcements of new airline ventures.

Now that Malaysia has also done this and failed dismally, the next logical question to ask is – why doesn’t the government allow Malaysia Airlines to fold up or go under?

There are two main reasons. Firstly, the perennial optimism of managers and shareholders. "Just one more chunk of money will see us break through into profitability as we rout the opposition!" seems to be the credo of these parties, based on self and not national interest. 

Secondly, there is government interference. This factor however is found less now as many governments have learnt not to come to the rescue of their airlines.

Malaysia has not learnt these lessons – initially for reasons of national pride tied to the ego of leaders but now increasingly apparently to save jobs and prevent retrenched employees from voting for the opposition. This may make sense politically but it is poor economics. – February 16, 2016.

* Koon Yew Yin reads The Malaysian Insider.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Comments

Please refrain from nicknames or comments of a racist, sexist, personal, vulgar or derogatory nature, or you may risk being blocked from commenting in our website. We encourage commenters to use their real names as their username. As comments are moderated, they may not appear immediately or even on the same day you posted them. We also reserve the right to delete off-topic comments