The Election Commission has decided that Kuala Besut voters will have to dip their fingers in ink instead of getting it brushed on for the July 24 by-election. Don't they understand the issue is the ink used in GE13 wasn't indelible, not the technique used to put on the ink? Does this mean the EC is using the same ink supplier who apparently used food dye with minimal silver nitrate? Or does it mean the EC doesn't know the difference between indelible and edible? The EC's job is to run the elections, not ruin it. One hopes it at least understands that difference.
Comments
Please refrain from nicknames or comments of a racist, sexist, personal, vulgar or derogatory nature, or you may risk being blocked from commenting in our website. We encourage commenters to use their real names as their username. As comments are moderated, they may not appear immediately or even on the same day you posted them. We also reserve the right to delete off-topic comments